by Jeffrey M. Anderson,
PhD.
I see a colleague on his hands and knees searching
the floor in the atrium.
"Jack, what did you
lose?"
"My contact."
"And where
were you
when it
popped out?"
"Oh, I was at the corner
table,
but the
light is better here."
A variant of an old joke; however, it depicts much of
what we do in training evaluation and measurement.
While many organizations make extensive efforts to
evaluate the on-line or classroom experiences and to
document learning, others focus on practical ways to
evaluate changes in employees' behaviors following
training. Increasingly, organization leaders and
training directors are worrying about and working on
proving the return on their training investment.
We are on our hands and knees asking questions that
center on the learning experience. Is it positive? Do
people learn? Do they use the skills? What is our
financial return on the training? Just as the contact
owner ignored the area most likely to contain the
contact, we in the training industry too often ignore
what is outside of the learning experience that
substantially shapes learning and performance
improvement.
We know that the learner's experience before training--being adequately
informed about the training and seeing its potential benefit--and after
training--being held accountable for using the skills--turns training into
a performance improvement strategy.
Practical Approach to Measuring What Impacts Performance
At the start of a class or on-line training, ask
the learners to complete a short survey about how well they have been prepared
for the training. As the director of training you will have timely information
about the percent of learners who--
• Received written information about the training.
• Talked with their supervisors about the training.
• Learned from their supervisors how the training will
be of use on the job.
By handing out the survey to the supervisors weeks before the training begins,
you are likely to increase the pre-training communication. Reporting the results
by department provides managers with a measure of the extent to which they are
contributing to training that drives performance.
A month after the training, resurvey the learners and ask them about how the
training is being reinforced in their work environments.
• Do their supervisors expect them to use the skills?
• Have the supervisors talked with them about what they
learned?
• Do they receive positive feedback from their customers,
coworkers, and supervisors when they use the skills?
• Do they have opportunities in their jobs to use the
skills?
Here, too, giving the post-training survey to supervisors before the training
begins will increase the likelihood that the use of skills will be reinforced
and developed. One sales organization that asked these questions learned that
all managers had prepared the sales force for training, but 55% of the sales
force had not had follow-up conversations with their managers. This finding was
the catalyst at a sales management meeting for carefully examining what managers
were and were not doing and for taking practical actions to reinforce use of
the training.
Performance improvement is responsibility of training
and management
Here are three steps for improving the results.
• Clarify the roles and responsibilities of training and of management in using
training to improve performance.
• Administer, summarize, and report findings from
two simple surveys that ask about how the learners were prepared for the
training and how the use of the training is reinforced.
• Use the survey results to affirm what is being
done well and to initiate problem solving for areas that are not being addressed.
|